The Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (APTEL) has accepted a plea of the National Solar Energy Federation of India (NSEFI) that it is wrong on the part of Tamil Nadu to not pay solar energy companies for energy supplied from higher capacity utilisation of the solar plants.
The Tamil Nadu Electricity Regulatory Commission (TNERC) had previously ruled that the amount of power for which payments are made to solar power generators is limited to the solar plant’s capacity utilisation of 19%, and not beyond it.
TNERC had held that “a contract cannot cause loss to the other party.” The regulator had observed that Tangedco, the State electricity generation and supply utility, pays more for solar power in order to promote renewable energy. “If the petitioners (solar companies) are to seek for payment for entire energy generated at higher CUFs for having maximized the output with optimised design of the solar power plant as put forth by the petitioners, they may have to settle for lesser tariffs for the entire energy generated with respect to the contracted capacity undergoing a re-determination of tariff as per statutory provisions.”
Unjust and unreasonable
However, APTEL has ruled in favour of the solar companies, on the grounds that there was no provision to accommodate Tangedco’s stand in the energy purchase agreements with the solar companies. In its verdict, delivered on November 28, the Tribunal said: “We decline to accept the argument put forth by Tangedco as it could not place before us any reasonable reply to the argument of the Appellants that none of the relevant agreements signed have any provision putting a cap on the generation beyond a capacity utilisation factor of 19 per cent inter-alia no payment shall be made for energy generated beyond 19 per cent capacity utilisation factor.”
 argued that Tamil Nadu should be accountable for the energy supplied){kind=link}